<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RHAM Volleyball &#187; Jonathan Law Volleyball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhamvolleyball.com/tag/jonathan-law-volleyball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhamvolleyball.com</link>
	<description>RHAM Sachems Girls Volleyball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 04:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>RHAM tops Law for Class M volleyball title</title>
		<link>http://rhamvolleyball.com/2008/11/15/rham-tops-law-for-class-m-volleyball-title/</link>
		<comments>http://rhamvolleyball.com/2008/11/15/rham-tops-law-for-class-m-volleyball-title/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhamvb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Schedule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Law Volleyball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rham volleyball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhamvolleyball.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By MICHAEL FORNABAIO
Staff writer, the Connecticut Post

// 
// ]]&#62;
// 
// ]]&#62;
NEWINGTON &#8212; Even when the laws of physics appeared to be on the side of Law girls volleyball Friday night, fate fell squarely on the side of top-seeded RHAM in the Class M championship match.
RHAM was already on the way to defending its championship with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="articleByline" class="articleByline">By MICHAEL FORNABAIO<br />
Staff writer, the <a href="http://www.connpost.com/ci_10988770">Connecticut Post</a></div>
<div id="articleBody" class="articleBody">
<div id="articleViewerGroup" class="articleViewerGroup" style="border: 0px none;"><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
                					var requestedWidth = 0;</p>
<p>// ]]&gt;</script></div>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
                				if(requestedWidth &gt; 0){
									document.getElementById('articleViewerGroup').style.width = requestedWidth + "px";
                					document.getElementById('articleViewerGroup').style.margin = "0px 0px 10px 10px";
                				}</p>
<p>// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<p><strong>NEWINGTON</strong> &#8212; Even when the laws of physics appeared to be on the side of Law girls volleyball Friday night, fate fell squarely on the side of top-seeded RHAM in the Class M championship match.</p>
<p>RHAM was already on the way to defending its championship with a 3-0 (25-18, 25-18, 25-15) victory at Newington. The Sachems led 19-10 in the third game. Law appeared to have gained a point back when a hit went off a Sachems defender, up into the rafters, off the ceiling, off the basketball-hoop stanchion, off the top of the backboard.</p>
<p>RHAM collected it calmly and won the point.</p>
<p>&#8220;Crazy. Just crazy,&#8221; Law senior setter Michelle Nantel said with a smile.<a href="http://rhamvolleyball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/chelsea-kill.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-169 alignright" style="margin: 5px;" title="chelsea-kill" src="http://rhamvolleyball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/chelsea-kill-150x150.jpg" alt="chelsea-kill" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>What else was new? Every attack the 11th-seeded Eagles presented, every way the Eagles defended, the Sachems had an answer. That&#8217;s probably why they went 24-0.</p>
<p>Law (19-6) did itself no favors early, though, falling behind 9-0 in the first game before scraping its way back. The Eagles didn&#8217;t hold a lead until the beginning of Game 3 and finished as runners-up for the fourth time in six years.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think we were ready,&#8221; Nantel said. &#8220;I really thought we&#8217;d beat them. I really thought we could. &#8220;¦ We need to fight, to fight for points.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Eagles made a few errors, both hitting and serve-receive, in that first game. But even when they set up Casey Dulin (16 kills, eight digs) on the left side, the Sachems were usually there for a dig.</p>
<p>&#8220;There might have been some nerves. That&#8217;s to be expected in a big match,&#8221; Law coach Stacy Loch said. &#8220;I don&#8217;t know if anybody really expected us to get here.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tournament MVP Tessa Smolinski had 10 digs in the match to go with 14 kills. Mallory Grosso, the Sachems&#8217; libero, had 11 digs, and Chelsea Fenton had eight.</p>
<p>&#8220;We passed the ball very, very well defensively,&#8221; RHAM coach Tim Guernsey said. &#8220;We never gave up on any ball.&#8221;</p>
<p>Law&#8217;s Megan Sweeney had 15 digs, and Kathleen Sweeney had 13 digs.</p>
<p>Loch said the Eagles tended to have a rough first game; Guernsey had told reporters the same thing about his team after the semifinals.In that semifinal round, Law got here with a hard-fought win Wednesday against Sacred Heart Academy.</p>
<p>That left little time to get a handle on the Sachems.</p>
<p>&#8220;Game, one practice, game: We weren&#8217;t fully prepared,&#8221; Loch said.</p>
<p>But Nantel, who had 29 assists, was more frustrated with her team&#8217;s mental approach.</p>
<p>&#8220;We weren&#8217;t as up as we were (against Sacred Heart Academy),&#8221; Nantel said.</p>
<p>RHAM built its lead more slowly in the second game, with the same result.</p>
<p>Loch said her team was called for more net violations than she could remember in other matches, and a few helped keep momentum on the Sachems&#8217; side.</p>
<p>The teams were tied four times in the third game, up to 7-7, before the Sachems took over.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve got to give it to them,&#8221; Nantel said. &#8220;They&#8217;re good.&#8221;</p>
<p>Class M championship</p>
<p>LAW	18 18 15&#8211;0</p>
<p>RHAM	25 25 25&#8211;3</p>
<p>Records: Law 19-6; RHAM 24-0</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rhamvolleyball.com/2008/11/15/rham-tops-law-for-class-m-volleyball-title/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
